Skip to content

Synthetic demonstration • 22 September 2026

Session only · refresh or reset clears changes · use fictional inputs

Proof of value / commercial discussion

Start focused. Prove the value.

Explore a Student Success pilot, compare the proposed packages, and make the assumptions visible before any commitment.

Proposed commercial anchors from the supplied client proposal. Final enrollment band, integrations, AI allowance and procurement terms remain subject to discovery. These are not committed prices.

Explore an annual value scenario

Editable fictional assumptions. None of these figures are actual CIT-U results.

Growth · scenario result

₱11,820,000

Modeled annual value before implementation costs

Retention contribution
₱6,000,000
Staff capacity value (non-cash)
₱5,820,000
Annual license anchor
₱14,400,000

Modeled value less license

-₱2,580,000

82.1% of license covered by the assumptions. At this staff-capacity value, 143 incremental retained students would cover the remaining license.

This is a planning model, not an ROI forecast. Staff capacity is not cash savings. Costs exclude custom integration, AI overage, taxes and change management. Validate attribution and avoid double-counting benefits.

A focused 12-week pilot

Discussion scope: Student Success AI + a limited knowledge assistant. Pilot budget anchor: ₱750K–₱1M, subject to agreement.

Weeks 1–2

Agree the baseline

Choose two pilot departments, owners, sample use cases and success measures.

Weeks 3–5

Validate the foundation

Assess integration feasibility, data quality, source approval and access design.

Weeks 6–8

Rehearse the workflow

Test Student 360, advisor review and source-backed assistance with pilot users.

Weeks 9–11

Measure and refine

Evaluate adoption, support response time, answer quality and staff effort.

Week 12

Review the evidence

Compare against the baseline and decide whether to proceed to Growth.

Agree what success means

Illustrative acceptance targets to negotiate during discovery; no pilot results are claimed.

MeasureMethodProposed ownerSample target
Advisor response timeMedian time from signal to first staff reviewStudent Success Office≤ 2 working days
Support follow-throughReviewed cases with a documented next actionPilot advisors≥ 80%
Answer qualityStaff-rated supported answers on a fixed question setKnowledge owners≥ 90%
Staff effortTime per comparable task before and during the pilotOperations sponsor≥ 20% reduction

Ready for a discovery conversation

Use this local checklist to shape the next meeting. It does not approve or submit anything.

0 of 4 discussion items reviewed. The client-ready proposal allows standard deployment under a multi-year agreement; the earlier commercial draft lists a separate setup range. Confirm the chosen structure in discovery.